The Author Guide (viewed 10/17/16) states that "[t]he Internal Medicine Review grants authors rights to publish their work in any form for any scholarly purpose." That's great -- authors get to pay at least $1250 (unless they qualify for fee reductions on unspecified grounds) to give away their copyright to a "journal" that has no known circulation.
The emails purport to be "confidential and intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed." In case you don't understand, they add that
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not read, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or at 712 H Street #1018 Washington DC 20002 USA. If you have received this e-mail by mistake or wish to not recieve [sic] future emails from us, and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.A two story building at 712 H St NE Washington DC 20002 is the location of Gold Spot, a payday loan and check cashing business. The website (viewed 1/27/17) uses the same fake address.
It is not apparent that there are any internists among the editors of Internal Medicine Review.
- Senior Editor Lisseth Tovar's qualifications begin "Department of Anesthesiology staff." But where is this department? The website Upwork indicates that she is "a very creative person" who consults in London for $8.00 an hour
I am Lisseth Tovar, Medical Doctor, specialist in Anesthesiologist [sic] and a very creative person too, I am here to help you out specific areas like: Prezi presentations, powerpoint presentations, spanish transcriptions, translations (spanish – english), copy writing, data entry, academical writing (specifically about medicine), data-entry (typing speed 50 WPM). I have experience in translations related to medical journals. I have a proven ability to maintain the confidentiality to my employers. ... I am here to provide you the best solution. Moreover good and completing any Project in given time, meeting deadlines according to the instruction that is what I am. ...
- Senior Editor Milena Mihaleva has the following qualifications (as listed in their entirety): "has served as a senior editor of the Internal Medicine Review since 2015."
- The Editors include "Dr. Chadwick C. Prodromos, MD, The Johns Hopkins Medical School." This means that he received an MD degree from Johns Hopkins, not that he is on the faculty there. He is "a board certified Orthopaedic Surgeon practicing in the Chicago Metropolitan area."
- The only other US editor is Dr. Timothy A. Mirtz. He is Assistant Professor and Chair, Department of Secondary and Physical Education at Bethune-Cookman University, Daytona Beach, Florida, and an "Adapted Physical Education Teacher" at a "Community, Educational and Vocational School."
- Clicking on the names of a couple of other members of the editorial board reveals a dentist, a transplant surgeon, and a "a physical activity psychology scientist."
The current issue (Dec. 2016) begins with an article from a Tetsuya Isobe on "The Treatment To Make Home Life Peaceful." Dr., Mr., or Ms. Isobe (I can't say which because no information beyond the name is provided) concludes that "[t]he efficacy for mental symptom of PMS in shallow acupuncture using the specific pattern of needle placement was excellent, and this treatment made home life peaceful." The author's evidence for the benefit to homelife is that "When asked 'Is your home life peaceful?', 51.1% (23/45) [of the patients receiving acupuncture] answered 'Yes'." Dispensing with control groups or any other kind of comparisons certainly would make medical research easier.
- Dr. Kaye DH, I came across your paper on The good, the bad, the ugly: the NAS report on strengthening forensic science in America. [sic] and was hoping to have the opportunity to discuss possibly having a followup to this paper or perhaps a short review article published in one of the next issues of the Internal Medicine Review. It would be interesting to see a paper with information on any continued research or new data since this was published. We are a peer-reviewed monthly journal, published both in print and online. The submission deadline is flexible. I would be happy to asnwer [sic] any of your questions. Please get back to me at your earliest convenience. Best Regards, Milena Mihaleva, Senior Editor, Internal Medicine Review Second try
- Received 10/13/16: Dear Dr. Kaye Dh, My colleague asked if I could get in touch with you about a paper you authored entitled "The good, the bad, the ugly: the NAS report on strengthening forensic science in America.". Firstly, thank you for taking the time to publish this, it was an interesting read. I am hoping to discuss with you having a short follow-up article or perhaps a review article published in one of the next issues of the Internal Medicine Review. ... It would not have to be a long article, but if you don't have time for this perhaps you could ask one of your co-authors or students to collaborate or contribute instead. If you have moved on from your previous research interests I am certainly interested in knowing more about your current projects; perhaps there is the potential for an article that would be published in our journal. If you have any questions about whether or not a certain subject fits our scope I can put you in contact with Dr. Chadwick Prodromos from our editorial board. Could you please let me know your thoughts on this? Sincerely, Dr. Lisseth Tovar, M. D., Senior Editor A few days later
- Received 10/17/16: Dear Dr. Kaye Dh, My last email must have reached you at a bad time so I am following up. If you are not the right person to talk to about this please let me know or feel free to forward this email. I am also pasting links to a couple of our recently published articles so you may have a sense of the style and formatting. Current Technological State of Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Lung Cancer. Longitudinal Follow-up Study of Bone Mineral Density in Adult Survivors of Solid Pediatric Cancers. Sincerely, Dr. Lisseth Tovar OK, I'll reply
- 10/17/16, to 'Dr. Lisseth Tovar, M.D.' RE: Followup to Dr. Kaye Dh's article?
Dear Dr. Tovar, Would you kindly send me the names of the editorial board members who are internists? Thanks, DHK
Lisseth and her colleagues ceased communicating with me until
- 1/25/17 Re: Checking in regarding your paper - The good, the bad, the ugly: the NAS report on strengthening forensic science in America: Dear Dr. Kaye DH, I wish you a happy new year. We talked some months ago about the idea of publishing a followup article to the one you authored entitled "The good, the bad, the ugly: the NAS report on strengthening forensic science in America.". Is now a better time for you to write something? Is there anything I can do to help? If now isn't the right time for you to work on a followup to this article, I would certainly be interested in knowing more about your current research. I will tell you more about the journal in case you don't still have our earlier emails. The Internal Medicine Review is a hybrid journal with optional open access. The issues are monthly, and published both online and in print. The submission deadline is flexible. Please get back to me at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, Dr. Lisseth Tovar, Senior Editor, Internal Medicine Review (IMR) To Lisseth, 1/27/17
- Dear Dr. Tovar, I like your idea, but before submitting my article, I want to be sure the editorial board has the requisite expertise to understand its remarkable contribution to medical science. Would you kindly send me the names of the editorial board members who are internists? Thanks, DHK [No reply received]
- 3/23/17: From: Internal Medicine Review [mailto:email@example.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 5:06 AM
To: the bad
Subject: Article for Internal Medicine Review
Special Issue: Clinical Medicine -- Mark your calendars for the Internal Medicine Review's special issue on clinical medicine. Research, reviews, and case reports will be published.
Now Lisseth has reset the clock.
- From: Lisseth Tovar, M.D. [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: July 18, 2017 7:03 AM
To: Dr. Kaye DH
Subject: Article followup
One of the articles you authored a while ago caught my attention and I am hoping to discuss with you publishing a followup article, or even a review article in the Internal Medicine Review. The article was entitled "The good - the bad - the ugly: the NAS report on strengthening forensic science in America.". I am sure our readers would find an article that continues this work valuable. The parameters of the article are flexible and I am happy to help in any way I can. Would you or perhaps one of your students have time to contribute an article over the summer?
Lisseth Tovar, M. D., Senior Editor, Internal Medicine Review, www.internalmedicinereview.org
This email and attachments sent with it are confidential and intended only for the use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not read, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or at 712 H Street Suite 1018 Washington DC 20002 USA. If you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.
- From: Dr. A Lesnevskyi, M.D. (email@example.com)
Sent: Wed 12/20/2017 7:15 AM (and again Mon 4/23/2018 1:00 AM)
Subject: The good - the bad - the ugly: the NAS report on strengthening forensic science in America.
Dear Dr. Kaye DH,
An article you authored caught my attention and I am hoping to discuss with you publishing a followup to it, or even a review article in an upcoming issue of the Internal Medicine Review. The article was titled "The good - the bad - the ugly: the NAS report on strengthening forensic science in America.". I think a new article in this area would be valuable and it would be great if you would consider preparing something. Please let me know if it is okay for me to send along more information about our journal.
Would you or maybe one of your students possibly have time to contribute an article this year?
A. Lesnevskyi, M.D. Senior Editor, Internal Medicine Review
[Same "strictly prohibited" confidentiality notice.]