SCIREA is an opaque publisher that does not reveal its location and staff. Its website describes the SCIREA Journal of Mathematics as "an international, scientific peer-reviewed open access journal published online by SCIREA" and promises publication within approximately 25 days of submission. It accomplishes this feat without a named editor-in-chief. The listings for the "editorial board" go on and on, surpassing 1,000 members apparently motivated to write instant reports by "vouchers entitling them to a discount on the APC [author publishing charge of $330 as of April 11, 2021] of their next publication in any SCIREA journal, in appreciation of the work done."
The "Instructions for Authors" contain these "Open Science Policy Guide Lines to Submit the Manuscript: The absolute prototype for manuscript is originality, high scientific quality and interest to a multidisciplinary audience." Among these works for a multidisciplinary audience are "On Еc-(δ-ßc)-Compact Spaces and Еc-(δ-ßc)-Separation Axioms" and "The Structure of Groups GL(3,F)."
The "issues" of the journal are often single articles. The abstract of one such 14-page article on "The So-called Seqed and Scientific cradle of the angle θ in ancient Egypt" (vol. 3, issue 2, April 24, 2018) begins:
Science is a matter of asking for information by specifying the difference between fact and opinion. Fact in a scientific context is a generally accepted reality, but still open to scientific inquiry, as opposed to an absolute truth, which is not a part of science. The hypotheses and theories are generally based on objective inferences, unlike opinions, which are generally based on subjective influences. Therefore and hence we can say ‘the facts versus the opinions’.
-
From: Newcomb Patricia [newcomb@sjmathematics.org]
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2020 1:15 PM
Subject: Invitation to Submit Your Papers (Deadly statistics: quantifying an 'unacceptable risk' in capital punishment)
Dear Kaye, DH
Greetings! Your article published in LAW PROBABILITY & RISK with the title Deadly statistics: quantifying an 'unacceptable risk' in capital punishment has left a deep impression on us. Below is the excerpt of your research which is highly appreciated by us: ...
[No signature line] -
From: Mitropoulos Panagiotis [mitropoulos@clinicalmedicinej.org]
McCarthy Sheila [mccarthy@sjmathematics.org]
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 1:43 AM
Thursday, October 22, 2020 1:47 PM
Subject: Submitting Your Research Paper (Deadly statistics: quantifying an 'unacceptable risk' in capital punishment)
Warm greetings from the assitant editor!
We are writing to show our deepest impression on your previous article titled Deadly statistics: quantifying an 'unacceptable risk' in capital punishment published in LAW PROBABILITY & RISK.
Below is the abstract of your research which has left us a deep impression: ...
[no signature line] -
From: Shu Chi-Min [shu@clinicalmedicinej.org]
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2021 4:14 AM
Subject: Invitation to Submit Your Manuscripts (Deadly statistics: quantifying an 'unacceptable risk' in capital punishment)
Dear Kaye, DH
Greetings! We have read your paper titled Deadly statistics: quantifying an 'unacceptable risk' in capital punishment which has been published in LAW PROBABILITY & RISK, and the topic of the paper has impressed us a lot.
Here attached the excerpt of your research which has left us a deep impression] ...
[no signature line] -
From: Anderson Jenny [jennyanderson@scijmat.org]
Harris Victoria [victoriaharris@scipj.org]
Sent: Sunday April 11, 2021 11:21 AM
Sunday, May 23, 2021 8:43 AM
Subject: Invitation to Submit Your Manuscripts (Deadly statistics: quantifying an 'unacceptable risk' in capital punishment)
Dear Kaye, DH
Greetings! We have learnt about your precious paper with the title Deadly statistics: quantifying an 'unacceptable risk' in capital punishment which has been published in LAW PROBABILITY & RISK, and the topic of the paper has impressed us a lot. Here attached the details of your research which has gave us a deep impression: ...
Click here to Contribute Your New Articles
[No signature line] -
From: Sharma Arun [sharma@healthj.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 2:49 PM
Subject: ЅսЬmіtting Your Research Articles (Deadly statistics: quantifying an 'unacceptable risk' in capital punishment)
Dear Kaye, DH
Warmest greetings! Your article with the title Deadly statistics: quantifying an 'unacceptable risk' in capital punishment which has been published in LAW PROBABILITY & RISK has left a deep impression on us. We are deeply impressed by your research, the excerpt of which is listed below: ...
Click here to Contribute Your New Αrtiϲlеѕ
[No signature line] -
From: Firoz Alam [firoz@sjofmat.org]
Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 2:12 AM
Subject: Inᴠitatіоn to ЅսЬmіt Your Research Article (Deadly statistics: quantifying an 'unacceptable risk' in capital punishment)
Dear Kaye, DH
Warm greetings!
We are writing to express our deep impression on your published article titled
Deadly statistics: quantifying an 'unacceptable risk' in capital punishment in LAW PROBABILITY & RISK. Here attached the details of your research which has gave us a deep impression:
1. Title: ...
2. Abstract: ...
Click here to Contribute Your New Αrtiϲlе
[No signature line]
NOTICE: As of 28 May 2021, I have stopped reproducing the incessant "Warm greetings!" emails from SCIREA journals. Pennsylvania State University has blacklisted the webpages for submitting manuscripts, noting that "Access to the Website you were trying to use has been blocked because it could possibly be unsafe or potentially malicious."
No comments:
Post a Comment